The malice and indefensible lack of professionalism in the Washington Post/Dana Milbank hit piece on former Mormon High Priest, Park B. Romney is beyond the pale and an egregious indictment on the ethics of the individual, Dana Milbank; the editors of the Washington Post; and the Corporate owners and sponsors. The hit piece remains, today, optimized by arrangement, to come up in the top of Google results on searches for Park B Romney. Illegitimate defamation of Park B. Romney, and obfuscation of the absolute truth of his message about Mormonism are the goals of an intelligence community that is now known and well understood by the public to be rank with corruption and hostile to American values and principles.

See: Washington Post/Dana Milbank hit piece on Park B Romney ("Mitt's crazy cousin")

An analysis of select excerpts from Milbank's journalistic abuses follows:
 
Dana Milbank: "Park Romney says some pretty wild things".

The Truth: The "wild things" attributed to former Mormon High Priest, Park Romney, by Dana Milbank, (whose motivation for malicious slander clearly exceeded, by far, his intellectual curiosity or journalistic professionalism or integrity), are that Mormonism is a fraud and that Mitt Romney is a party to oaths and covenants of loyalty to the Mormon Church that supersede all other loyalties.

Park Romney is a former High Priest of the Mormon Church having devoted a lifetime in its service, and having been a party to LDS Temple rights involving the very covenants to which he refers. Dana Milbank has no such knowledge and no rational basis for assessing Park Romney's concerns to lack credibility. Overwhelming and conclusive proof of the fraud of Mormonism and its malice and abuses of public and private trust and the overt deceitfulness of the Mormon Church and its leadership are now well exposed, and acknowledged, in part, by the Washington Post, some 7 years later. Lacking any credible basis for his "opinions", it is reasonable to surmise that Dana Milbank and the Washington Post had some other motivation for their slander. The answer to that question is laid bare in the following articles...

See: Mormonism: An Insidious Contemporary Fraud
See: Mormonism: Intent to Deceive
See: Strengthening Church Member's Committee
See: The Mormon World View

The veracity of Park B Romney's contention about Mormon loyalties and conflicts of interest in public service are made unmistakably clear in this video of leaked discussions of Mormon leadership, contradicting Mormon Apostle, Jeffrey Holland's disingenuous representations in a speech at Harvard.

See: Leaked truth of Mormon agendas and loyalties exposed in video

Dana Milbank: "The Gay Rights group, Pride in Utah, has embraced him (Park B Romney) as a spokesman".

The Truth: Park Romney was interviewed, once, in a pod cast, by Pride in Utah. He was asked about his support for Gay Marriage (Park Romney supports marriage as a human right). Park B Romney is not gay and is utterly unqualified to be a spokesperson for the Gay community. He has never been asked or invited to play such a role, nor would he accept such an absurdly unlikely invitation if it came. The idea of it is preposterous. He is not only NOT embraced by the Gay community as a spokesperson, he is not particularly appreciated at all by the Gay community who makes greater efforts to avoid and undermine him than embrace him. While Park Romney supports the right of Gay marriage, he is appalled and offended by Gay activism that imposes itself aggressively and militantly on school children. Milbank's unfounded framing of Park B Romney as a "spokesperson" is, apparently, motivated by an offensive effort to discredit him in the minds of Homophobes.

Dana Milbank: "We don't ignore the birther movement, anti-semites on the left, Tea Party racists or people who encourage violence on the airwaves, and I don't think Park Romney should be ignored either."

The Truth: To associate Park Romney, in any way. loosely or specifically, with anti-semites, racists, or people who encourage violence is utterly unfounded and ripe with malicious intent. To undermine a thoughtful person who made huge and courageous sacrifices to tell an inconvenient truth that is unwelcomed by the US intelligence community and its dedicated journal, the Washington Post, is shameful. The legitimacy of Park Romney's expressed concerns, and the obvious respectfulness with which they have been expressed is demonstrated in the following articles...

See: Mormonism vs. Other Christian Faiths
See: Is anti-Mormonism Bigotry?
See: The Paradox of Bigotry and Mormonism
See: Functional Families and the Social Contract
See: In Support of Resignation
See: We Stand with Israel
See: Canaries in the World's Coal Mine

Dana Milbank: "Park Romney, who declined to comment for this column..."

The Truth: Park Romney was never offered an opportunity to comment on any of the offensively inaccurate representations in this column and had no idea Dana Milbank would stoop so low, until the column was published, and syndicated nationwide. He (Romney) was asked if he would do an interview. He declined an interview in which he would be quoted, but agreed to answer questions off the record about Mormonism by way of research guidance if Milbank wanted to ask any. No questions came. When this article was published, Romney immediately sent a letter of objection (by email) to the Washington Post. It was ignored.

The column clearly draws conclusions about and falsely frames Park Romney in ways that Milbank was well informed that he might have availed himself of the opportunity to ask Park about. No such effort was made. No notice whatsoever was given to Park on any of the conclusions drawn and promoted, and malignant framing engaged in by Milbank. The suggestion that Park had an opportunity is consistent with the patently dishonest nature of the column, and therefore the man, Dana Milbank. It is a clear indictment on the Washington Post.

Dana Milbank: "Park Romney's use of the family name is darker than Billy's Beer".

The Truth: Park Romney's name happens to be Park Romney. What would have met with the illustrious Dana Milbank's approval for Park Romney to call himself? Shirley Temple? In private correspondence with Mitt Romney's father, George Romney, (former governor of Michigan, also a Presidential candidate, and former US Secretary of HUD), Park's uncle, George, reminisced with Park about his affection for Park's grandfather, also named Park, on whose farm in Cache Valley, Utah, George had occasion to work. Would you like to see the letter, Dana? Or would that be too much research, given the objectives of the piece you wrote?

As to the "darkness" of Park's presumptuous use of his own name, Dana, since we are on the subject of darkness... What of the obvious dimness of the light of your soul or intellect, or journalistic ethics, having stooped to this level? And to what end? To serve what master? What was the price for your integrity, Dana? How much did it sell for? How long ago, was that initial transaction?

Conclusion: Dana Milbank has, by this commentary, distinguished himself as a hack for dark and unethical interests that are devoid of rational boundaries. The credibility of the Washington Post would have been forever tarnished by this bit, if it were not already in the tank with people who understand its relationship and the Mormon Mafia's relationship to the CIA.

See (return to) Calculated Defamation
See (return to) The Apostasy of a High Priest (The Book)
See also: Strengthening Church Members Committee
See also: Unethical Collaboration

---